Stepping into the world of performance running shoes often leads to a crucial question: how does one brand’s fit compare to another? Specifically, how do Saucony shoes stack up against On Running? This is a critical consideration for runners seeking optimal comfort, performance, and injury prevention. After all, an ill-fitting shoe can derail even the most dedicated training plan. Furthermore, understanding the nuances of each brand’s sizing and overall fit is paramount. This comparison will delve into the key differences between Saucony and On, exploring aspects such as toe box width, heel security, arch support, and overall feel, ultimately equipping you with the knowledge to make an informed decision for your next pair of running shoes. Prepare to discover which brand caters best to your individual foot shape and running style.
Firstly, let’s discuss Saucony’s fit. Generally, Saucony running shoes are known for their accommodating toe boxes, providing ample room for natural toe splay. This is particularly beneficial for runners who prefer a more relaxed fit or those with wider feet. Moreover, Saucony offers a variety of widths, from narrow to extra-wide, catering to a diverse range of foot shapes. In contrast, On Running shoes tend to have a more streamlined, narrower fit through the forefoot. While this can provide a snug, performance-oriented feel for some, it might feel restrictive for runners accustomed to a wider toe box. Consequently, it’s essential to consider your individual foot shape and preferences when comparing these two brands. Additionally, Saucony typically offers a more traditional heel cup, providing a secure and locked-in feel. On the other hand, On Running shoes often feature a more minimalist heel design, prioritizing a natural, free-flowing stride. Therefore, runners who prefer a more supportive and structured heel counter might find Saucony a better fit.
Secondly, arch support is another key differentiator between Saucony and On. Saucony offers a range of models with varying levels of arch support, from neutral cushioning to more supportive stability shoes. This allows runners to choose a shoe that aligns with their individual biomechanics and support needs. Conversely, On Running shoes typically feature a more neutral arch support, catering to runners with neutral gaits or those who prefer a less structured feel. However, it’s important to note that On’s CloudTec cushioning system provides a unique form of support, absorbing impact and propelling the runner forward. In addition, the overall feel of these two brands differs significantly. Saucony shoes generally offer a more traditional, grounded feel, providing a stable platform for runners. Meanwhile, On Running shoes are known for their distinctive, almost bouncy feel, thanks to the CloudTec technology. This can feel incredibly responsive and energetic for some runners, while others might find it takes some getting used to. Ultimately, the best way to determine which brand is right for you is to try them on and experience the fit and feel firsthand. Consider your individual needs, preferences, and running style when making your decision.
Saucony vs. On: A General Fit Comparison
When it comes to running shoes, fit is paramount. Both Saucony and On have carved out their own niches in the running world, each boasting unique technologies and design philosophies. This inevitably leads to differences in how their shoes fit. Understanding these nuances is crucial for selecting the right shoe for your individual foot shape, running style, and comfort preferences. This comparison aims to provide a general overview of the fit differences between these two popular brands, helping you navigate the sometimes-confusing landscape of running shoe selection.
Generally speaking, Saucony tends to offer a more traditional, accommodating fit. Many runners find Saucony shoes comfortable straight out of the box, with a good balance of cushioning and support. On the other hand, On shoes are known for their distinctive CloudTec® outsole, which provides a unique, responsive feel. This technology can influence the fit, sometimes resulting in a snugger, more performance-oriented feel. While this can be ideal for some runners, others might require a break-in period or a slightly different sizing approach compared to their experience with Saucony.
One key difference lies in the toe box area. Saucony shoes generally offer a wider toe box, allowing for more natural toe splay, which can be beneficial for runners who prioritize comfort and need extra room for their toes to move. This wider toe box can also help prevent blisters and other foot irritations often associated with cramped toe areas. Conversely, On shoes often have a more streamlined, narrower toe box. This design choice contributes to the shoe’s overall performance-oriented feel, promoting a secure, locked-in sensation. Runners with wider feet or those who prefer a more spacious toe box may find they need to size up in On shoes or explore specific models known for a wider fit. It’s also worth noting that the perception of toe box width can vary between different models within each brand, so researching specific shoe models is always recommended.
The midfoot fit also distinguishes these two brands. Saucony shoes frequently provide a more accommodating midfoot, offering a secure yet flexible feel. This can be appealing to runners who prefer a less constricting fit through the arch and midfoot area. On shoes, with their focus on performance, tend to offer a more snug and supportive midfoot fit. This can enhance the feeling of connection with the ground and improve responsiveness, but may feel too tight for some runners, particularly those with higher arches or who prefer a more relaxed midfoot feel.
Heel fit is another important consideration. Saucony is known for providing a relatively standard heel cup, offering a good balance of security and comfort. Many runners find that Saucony’s heel cups effectively lock down the heel, minimizing slippage and maximizing comfort. On, in contrast, often employs a more sculpted, form-fitting heel cup. This design can enhance the feeling of stability and responsiveness, but some runners may experience initial tightness or require a break-in period. Trying on different models and paying close attention to the heel cup design is crucial for finding the optimal fit.
| Feature | Saucony | On |
|---|---|---|
| Toe Box | Generally Wider | Generally Narrower |
| Midfoot | More Accommodating | More Snug and Supportive |
| Heel | Standard, Secure | Sculpted, Form-Fitting |
Saucony vs. On: Cushioning
Content about cushioning comparison.
Saucony vs. On: Stability
Content about stability comparison.
Saucony vs. On: Durability
Content about durability comparison.
Comparing Saucony’s Standard Fit to On’s Feel
Saucony and On are two popular running shoe brands known for their distinct feels and fits. Understanding these differences is key to choosing the right shoe for your foot and running style. Let’s delve into a comparison of Saucony’s standard fit and On’s unique feel.
Saucony’s Standard Fit
Saucony generally offers a more traditional fit, often described as “true to size.” This means that their shoes typically fit as expected based on your usual shoe size. They tend to provide a comfortable, secure hold with a balanced amount of room in the toe box and midfoot. However, it’s always recommended to try them on or consult a shoe fitting guide to ensure the best fit for your individual foot shape.
On’s Feel
On running shoes stand out with their distinctive CloudTec cushioning system. These “clouds” are individual pods on the outsole designed to absorb impact and propel you forward. This technology creates a unique feel that many runners describe as responsive and cushioned yet firm. The sensation is often described as “running on clouds,” which gives the brand its name. Beyond the CloudTec system, On shoes typically have a snugger fit, particularly in the midfoot, compared to Saucony. This close-to-the-foot feel is designed to enhance proprioception – your awareness of your foot’s position – and provide a more connected feel to the ground. This can feel quite different from the more traditional fit of a Saucony. The toe box tends to be more streamlined and less roomy than many Saucony models, so those with wider feet might find some On models a bit constricting. On’s performance-oriented models, especially, tend towards this snugger fit. However, On also offers some models with wider fits specifically catering to runners who need more space. This variation within their lineup makes trying different models, or carefully researching reviews based on foot type, a crucial step in finding the right On shoe.
Here’s a quick breakdown of the key differences:
| Feature | Saucony (Standard Fit) | On |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Fit | True to size, balanced | Snug, particularly in the midfoot; varies by model |
| Toe Box | Generally roomy | More streamlined, less roomy; wider options available |
| Midfoot | Standard width | Snug fit, designed for proprioception |
| Cushioning | Varies by model, generally traditional | CloudTec system, distinctive responsive and firm feel |
| Ground Feel | Moderately connected | Close-to-the-ground feel, enhanced by CloudTec |
It’s important to keep in mind that both brands offer various models with different fits and features, so these are generalizations. The best way to find the perfect fit for your foot is to try on different models from both Saucony and On and pay attention to how they feel during movement.
Narrow Feet? Saucony vs. On Fit Considerations
Choosing the right running shoe can feel like navigating a minefield, especially if you have narrow feet. Both Saucony and On Running are popular brands known for performance and comfort, but their fit can vary significantly. Understanding these differences is crucial for finding a shoe that supports your foot properly and prevents discomfort or injury.
Narrow Feet?
Runners with narrow feet often struggle to find shoes that fit snugly without slipping or sliding. A shoe that’s too wide can lead to blisters, instability, and a general feeling of sloppiness. Both Saucony and On offer options for narrower feet, but they approach the issue in slightly different ways.
Saucony vs. On Fit Considerations
Saucony generally offers a more traditional fit with a range of widths available in many of their models. This allows those with narrow feet to select a shoe specifically designed for their foot shape. On, on the other hand, tends to lean towards a more streamlined, sock-like fit. While this can feel incredibly comfortable for some, it can be too narrow or constricting for others, particularly those with higher arches or wider forefeet.
Fit and Feel
Saucony shoes often feature a more structured upper with a defined heel counter and a secure midfoot. This provides a good level of support and stability, which is beneficial for narrow feet that might be prone to overpronation or ankle instability. On shoes, by contrast, prioritize a lightweight, minimalist feel. Their signature CloudTec cushioning system creates a unique sensation, often described as running on clouds. While the upper materials are typically flexible and breathable, they may offer less support for those with very narrow feet.
Cushioning
Saucony utilizes a variety of cushioning technologies across their different models, ranging from responsive and firm to plush and highly cushioned. This allows runners to choose a shoe that matches their preferred level of cushioning and support. On’s CloudTec system provides a distinct cushioned landing followed by a firm push-off. This can feel quite different from traditional foam cushioning and may take some getting used to.
Sizing and Width Options
One of the key advantages of Saucony for narrow feet is their availability in different widths. This makes it easier to find a shoe that fits snugly without being too tight. While On does offer some models in a slim fit, their overall sizing tends to be more standardized. It’s crucial to try on On shoes or consult reviews from other narrow-footed runners before committing to a purchase.
Upper Materials and Construction
Saucony often employs engineered mesh uppers that offer breathability and flexibility while maintaining a secure fit. On utilizes a variety of lightweight and breathable materials, often incorporating sock-like constructions for a seamless and comfortable feel. However, this can sometimes translate to a less secure fit for those with narrow feet.
Arch Support
Saucony generally offers moderate arch support in their shoes, which can be beneficial for those with narrow feet and lower arches. On’s shoes typically have a lower arch profile, which may be preferable for those with higher arches but could feel insufficient for those with flatter feet.
Comparing Key Features
| Feature | Saucony | On |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | Traditional, various widths available | Streamlined, sock-like |
| Cushioning | Varied, from firm to plush | CloudTec, unique cushioned landing and firm push-off |
| Width Options | Widely available | Limited slim fit options |
| Arch Support | Moderate | Lower |
Wide Feet?
For runners with wider feet, finding the right shoe can feel like a quest for the Holy Grail. A tight toe box can lead to blisters, ingrown toenails, and general discomfort, ultimately derailing your runs. Both Saucony and On Running are aware of this common issue and offer options designed to accommodate wider feet, but their approaches differ slightly.
Which Brand Offers More Room: Saucony or On?
This is where things get a bit more nuanced. While both brands cater to wider feet, Saucony generally offers a more consistently generous fit across their wide shoe models. They’ve been making running shoes for a long time and seem to have a strong grasp of what wider feet truly need.
Saucony’s Approach to Wide Fit
Saucony typically offers their popular models in standard, wide, and extra-wide widths, designated by a “W” or “2E” and “4E” respectively, after the size. This clear labeling system makes it easy to find the right fit. Their wide shoes are not just stretched versions of the standard model; they are often built on a wider last (the mold used to shape the shoe). This results in a more comfortable, accommodating fit throughout the shoe, not just in the toe box.
Saucony Wide Fit: A Detailed Look
Saucony’s commitment to wide fit goes beyond just offering different widths. They understand that foot volume plays a crucial role in comfort. Their wide models often feature a more accommodating upper, providing extra space not just in width but also in depth. This is particularly beneficial for runners with high arches or thicker feet. The extra volume prevents the top of the shoe from pressing down on the foot, reducing the risk of discomfort and blisters. Moreover, Saucony often employs softer, more pliable materials in the upper of their wide shoes, which further enhances comfort and allows the shoe to conform to the unique shape of the foot. This attention to detail makes a significant difference, especially on longer runs. They have also integrated features like ISOFIT and FORMFIT, which adapt to the shape and movement of the foot, providing a dynamic and supportive fit regardless of width. This personalized fit is a hallmark of Saucony’s approach and contributes to their reputation for catering to a wide range of foot types.
Several popular Saucony models are available in wide versions, including the Kinvara, Guide, Triumph, and Hurricane, giving runners ample options to choose from based on their individual needs and preferences. This comprehensive approach to wide fit truly sets Saucony apart and makes them a reliable choice for runners seeking comfort and performance.
On Running’s Approach to Wide Fit
On Running, a newer player in the running shoe game, takes a slightly different tack. They don’t typically label their shoes with specific width designations. Instead, many of their models are built on a wider last to begin with, offering more room in the forefoot than traditionally narrower running shoes. This can be great for runners who find standard width shoes slightly too snug but don’t necessarily require a dedicated “wide” fit. However, those with truly wide feet may still find some On models too narrow. They’ve also received feedback about the toe box being relatively shallow in certain models.
| Feature | Saucony | On Running |
|---|---|---|
| Wide Fit Offerings | Explicit wide (W, 2E) and extra-wide (4E) options. | Generally wider last, but no explicit wide sizes. |
| Toe Box | Often more accommodating in wide versions. | Can feel snug or shallow depending on the model. |
| Upper Volume | Designed with more depth in wide models for high arches or thicker feet. | Can vary; some models might feel tight on high-volume feet. |
Assessing Heel-to-Toe Drop: Saucony vs. On
Heel-to-toe drop, often referred to as simply “drop,” measures the difference in height between the heel and forefoot of a running shoe. This seemingly small detail plays a significant role in how your foot strikes the ground and can influence your running gait. Understanding the drop of both Saucony and On shoes is crucial for selecting the right shoe for your individual needs.
What is Heel-to-Toe Drop and Why Does It Matter?
Heel-to-toe drop is measured in millimeters (mm). A higher drop encourages a heel strike, while a lower drop promotes a midfoot or forefoot strike. Traditional running shoes often feature a higher drop (10-12mm), whereas more minimalist or modern shoes tend to have a lower drop (0-6mm). The right drop for you depends on your running style, biomechanics, and personal preference. Some runners find a higher drop more comfortable and supportive, while others prefer the more natural feel of a lower drop.
Saucony’s Approach to Heel-to-Toe Drop
Saucony offers a variety of drops across their different models, catering to a range of running styles. They offer shoes with higher drops for runners who prefer a more traditional feel and maximum cushioning, as well as lower drop options for those seeking a more natural, ground-feel experience. This allows runners to choose a Saucony shoe that aligns with their individual biomechanics and preferences. For example, their Kinvara model is known for its lower drop, promoting a midfoot strike, while the Triumph provides a higher drop and plush cushioning for heel strikers.
On’s Unique Approach to Heel-to-Toe Drop
On Running shoes stand out due to their distinctive CloudTec® cushioning system. This system consists of individual pods or “clouds” under the foot. This unique design affects the perception of heel-to-toe drop. While On shoes technically have a drop listed (typically around 4-6mm), the sensation while running can feel different compared to a traditional shoe with the same drop. The compression and rebound of the Cloud elements create a more cushioned landing regardless of your foot strike, potentially masking the feeling of the traditional heel-to-toe drop. This can be beneficial for runners transitioning to a lower drop shoe, providing a smoother experience. However, it’s important to note that even though the feel might be different, the actual drop measurement still influences biomechanics.
Comparing Saucony and On’s Heel-to-Toe Drops
Directly comparing Saucony and On’s heel-to-toe drops requires looking at specific models. Saucony’s offerings span a wider range, from higher drops in their maximal cushioning shoes down to lower drops in their more performance-oriented models. On tends to focus on a moderate drop range, usually within the 4-6mm spectrum. This doesn’t mean one brand is better than the other; it simply reflects their design philosophies and target audiences. Saucony caters to a broader range of runners, while On tends to attract those seeking a more unique, cushioned running experience. The crucial factor is to understand your own needs and preferences. Do you prefer a higher drop for more cushioning and a heel strike, or are you aiming for a midfoot strike with a lower drop? Then select a model from either brand that aligns with your requirements. It’s recommended to try on shoes from both brands to experience the difference firsthand and understand how each brand’s drop translates to your running gait.
| Feature | Saucony | On |
|---|---|---|
| Heel-to-Toe Drop Range | Varies widely (e.g., 0mm-12mm) | Typically 4-6mm |
| Cushioning | Variety of cushioning levels | CloudTec® system provides unique cushioning |
| Foot Strike Tendency | Caters to different foot strikes based on model | Generally encourages midfoot strike |
Choosing the Right Drop for You
Selecting the appropriate heel-to-toe drop is a personal journey. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Factors to consider include your current running style, any history of injuries, and your comfort level. If you’re accustomed to a higher drop, transitioning to a lower drop should be gradual to avoid stressing your calves and Achilles tendon. Experimenting with different drops from both Saucony and On can provide valuable insight into what feels best for your body. Consulting with a running specialist or physical therapist can also be helpful in determining the most suitable drop for your individual biomechanics and running goals. Ultimately, the right drop will contribute to a more comfortable, efficient, and injury-free running experience. Don’t be afraid to try different models and brands until you find the perfect fit.
Arch Support: How Saucony and On Stack Up
When it comes to running shoes, arch support is crucial for comfort and injury prevention. Both Saucony and On Running offer various levels of support, catering to different foot types and running styles. Understanding the nuances of each brand’s approach to arch support can help you make an informed decision when choosing your next pair of running shoes.
Comparing Arch Support in Saucony and On
Saucony generally provides a more traditional approach to arch support. They offer models with varying levels of support, ranging from neutral to high arch. This makes it easier for runners to find a shoe that suits their specific needs. On, on the other hand, tends to favor a more minimalist and natural feel, which can translate to less structured arch support in some models. This approach prioritizes ground feel and encourages a natural foot strike, which can be beneficial for some runners but less supportive for those who need more structure.
Understanding Arch Types and Support Levels
Before diving into the specifics of each brand, it’s helpful to understand your own arch type. High arches often require more support to prevent overpronation (inward rolling of the foot), while low arches or flat feet may benefit from shoes with motion control features. Neutral arches generally fall somewhere in between and can tolerate a wider range of support levels.
Saucony’s Approach to Arch Support
Saucony incorporates various technologies to provide arch support. Their FORMFIT system conforms to the shape of your foot, offering a personalized fit. They also use different densities of foam in the midsole, providing targeted cushioning and support where you need it most. Furthermore, Saucony’s PWRRUN+ cushioning offers a responsive yet supportive ride, contributing to overall arch stability.
On’s Approach to Arch Support
On Running utilizes CloudTec technology, which consists of individual pods that compress on impact and then spring back to propel you forward. This design promotes a natural running gait but can feel less supportive for runners accustomed to traditional arch support. While On doesn’t explicitly categorize its shoes by arch type, some models, like the Cloudflyer, offer slightly more support than others, catering to runners who prefer a more stable ride.
A Detailed Comparison of Arch Support
Choosing between Saucony and On for arch support depends largely on your individual foot type and running style. Saucony offers a wider range of support levels, making it easier to find a shoe that caters to specific needs, from high arches to flat feet. They use technologies like FORMFIT and varying foam densities to provide targeted support and cushioning. On the other hand, On Running emphasizes a natural feel with their CloudTec technology, which might be less structured but promotes a more natural foot strike. This can be great for runners with neutral arches or those who prefer a minimalist feel. However, runners who need more substantial arch support, especially those with overpronation or high arches, might find On’s shoes less supportive than Saucony’s structured options. Ultimately, trying on shoes from both brands and considering your individual biomechanics is the best way to determine the right fit.
| Feature | Saucony | On |
|---|---|---|
| Arch Support | Varied, from neutral to high | Generally less structured, more minimalist |
| Technology | FORMFIT, PWRRUN+ | CloudTec |
| Suitable for | Wide range of foot types | Neutral arches, minimalist runners |
Finding Your Perfect Fit: Considerations for Different Arch Types
For runners with low arches or flat feet, Saucony’s Guide and Hurricane models offer stability and motion control features to prevent overpronation. On’s Cloudflyer could also be an option, but it’s crucial to test it out to ensure adequate support. Runners with neutral arches have more flexibility and can explore both brands. Saucony’s Kinvara and Triumph offer balanced cushioning and support, while On’s Cloudstratus and Cloudflow provide a more responsive ride. For high arches, Saucony’s Ride and Freedom models offer ample cushioning without excessive support, allowing for natural foot movement. While On may not be the first choice for high arches due to its minimalist nature, some runners might find the Cloudultra comfortable with the addition of custom orthotics for enhanced support.
Toe Box Room: Saucony vs. On - A Closer Look
When it comes to running shoes, a comfortable toe box is crucial. It’s where your toes live for miles at a time, so adequate space and a good shape can make or break your run. Both Saucony and On Running have distinct toe box designs that cater to different foot shapes and running styles. Let’s take a deeper dive into how they compare.
Saucony’s Toe Box Philosophy
Saucony generally offers a more traditional and accommodating toe box. They lean towards a wider design, especially in their popular models like the Kinvara, Triumph, and Guide. This extra room allows your toes to splay naturally, which can improve stability and comfort, especially over longer distances.
On’s Toe Box Philosophy
On, on the other hand, tends to have a narrower, more streamlined toe box, reflecting their focus on a performance-oriented fit. Models like the Cloudstratus and Cloudflow offer a snug fit that some runners appreciate for its secure feel, while others find it restrictive, particularly those with wider feet or those who prefer a more relaxed fit in the forefoot.
Comparing Toe Box Shapes: Round vs. Tapered
Saucony often features a more rounded toe box shape, which mirrors the natural curvature of the toes. This allows for a relaxed fit that accommodates a variety of foot shapes. On’s toe boxes, conversely, are sometimes more tapered or pointed, particularly in their racing-oriented models. This sleek design reduces bulk and enhances the shoe’s aerodynamic profile, but can potentially lead to discomfort for runners with wider feet or those prone to toe crowding.
Toe Box Height: Another Key Difference
The height of the toe box is another factor to consider. Saucony typically offers a moderate toe box height, providing enough space for most foot types without feeling overly roomy. On’s toe boxes sometimes have a lower profile, designed to enhance ground feel and responsiveness. However, this lower height could be an issue for runners with high arches or thicker socks, potentially leading to pressure or rubbing on the top of the toes.
The Impact of Different Toe Box Designs on Performance
The differences in toe box design between Saucony and On can significantly impact performance. Saucony’s more spacious toe box tends to favor comfort and stability over long distances, allowing for natural toe splay and reducing the risk of blisters and hot spots. On’s snugger fit prioritizes a secure and responsive feel, which can be beneficial for faster paces and agile movements, though it may compromise comfort for some runners during extended runs.
Material Matters: Flexibility and Breathability
The materials used in the toe box construction also play a role in overall comfort. Saucony frequently employs engineered mesh that offers good breathability and flexibility. This allows the shoe to move naturally with the foot, further enhancing comfort. On often uses performance-oriented mesh or synthetic overlays that provide a snug and supportive fit, though breathability can vary depending on the specific model.
Finding Your Perfect Fit: Considerations for Wide Feet, Narrow Feet, and Everything In Between
Choosing the right shoe depends heavily on your individual foot shape and running style. Runners with wider feet or those who prefer a more spacious toe box will likely find Saucony models like the Kinvara or Triumph more accommodating. These shoes offer ample room for toe splay and reduce the risk of discomfort during long runs. For runners with narrower feet or those seeking a performance-oriented fit, On models like the Cloudstratus or Cloudflow might be a good option, provided they don’t feel overly restrictive. It’s essential to try on different models from both brands and consider factors like toe shape, toe box height, and overall fit to determine which shoe best suits your needs. If you have particularly wide or narrow feet, consulting a running shoe specialist can be valuable in finding the perfect fit. They can analyze your foot type and recommend models that cater to your specific requirements. Remembering that half sizes can also make a difference, so don’t be afraid to experiment until you find that Goldilocks fit – not too tight, not too loose, but just right. Here’s a handy table to help you visualize the differences:
| Feature | Saucony | On |
|---|---|---|
| Toe Box Width | Generally Wider | Generally Narrower |
| Toe Box Shape | Often Rounded | Often Tapered/Pointed |
| Toe Box Height | Moderate | Sometimes Lower |
Which Brand is Right for You?
Ultimately, the best way to decide between Saucony and On is to try them on and see what feels best. Every runner’s foot is different, and personal preference plays a significant role. Considering factors like toe box shape, width, and height will help you make an informed decision and find the perfect shoe to support your running journey.
Upper Materials and Fit: Differences Between Saucony and On
When choosing between Saucony and On running shoes, understanding the nuances of their upper construction and overall fit is crucial. Both brands offer a range of options, but their approaches to materials and design create distinct experiences for runners. Let’s delve into the key differences:
Upper Materials
Saucony often utilizes engineered mesh in their uppers. This material provides breathability and a comfortable, sock-like fit. They also incorporate 3D-printed overlays for targeted support and structure without adding unnecessary weight. Different models within the Saucony line may use variations of mesh, offering a spectrum from highly breathable to more robust and protective. On, on the other hand, frequently employs a combination of engineered mesh and more technical fabrics. Some On models feature a signature, almost translucent mesh that prioritizes lightweight breathability, while others utilize a denser weave for increased durability. Certain On shoes also incorporate recycled materials in their upper construction, aligning with a focus on sustainability.
Breathability and Comfort
Both Saucony and On prioritize breathability in their upper designs, but their approaches differ. Saucony’s engineered mesh allows for excellent airflow, keeping feet cool and dry during runs. On’s highly breathable mesh provides a similar experience, particularly in models designed for warmer weather or speedwork. However, some On shoes with denser uppers may trade a bit of breathability for increased support and durability. In terms of comfort, Saucony generally offers a more immediately plush and accommodating feel, while On often requires a short break-in period. Once broken in, however, On shoes provide a unique, almost second-skin-like sensation.
Fit and Feel
Saucony running shoes typically provide a more traditional fit, often with a wider toe box and a secure midfoot. This makes them a popular choice for runners who prefer a comfortable, spacious feel. On, in contrast, tends to offer a more snug, performance-oriented fit, particularly in the midfoot and heel. This locked-down sensation can contribute to a feeling of agility and responsiveness. It’s important to note that fit preferences can vary greatly, so trying on both brands is essential for finding the best match.
Heel-to-Toe Drop
Heel-to-toe drop, the difference in height between the heel and forefoot of the shoe, plays a significant role in the overall feel and running experience. Saucony offers a variety of drop options, catering to different running styles and preferences, ranging from 4mm to 8mm. This versatility allows runners to select a shoe that aligns with their natural gait and stride. On also offers a range of drops, but typically leans towards lower drops, typically between 4mm and 6mm. This lower drop encourages a more midfoot or forefoot strike, which some runners find promotes a more natural and efficient running form.
Width Options
Saucony generally offers a wider range of width options compared to On, making them a good choice for runners with wider feet or those who prefer a more spacious toe box. This inclusivity in sizing ensures a comfortable fit for a broader range of foot shapes. On, while offering some models in wider fits, typically has a narrower last, catering to runners with a slimmer foot profile. This narrower fit contributes to the locked-down sensation many On runners appreciate.
Sizing Consistency
| Brand | Sizing Consistency |
|---|---|
| Saucony | Generally true to size, with consistent sizing across different models. |
| On | Can vary slightly between models; some runners recommend going half a size up. |
Saucony tends to be very consistent in sizing across their various models. This makes it easier to find the right fit without having to experiment too much. On, while generally true to size, can have slight variations in fit between models. Some runners recommend going half a size up in On shoes, especially if they fall between sizes or have wider feet. It’s always a good idea to consult the specific size chart for the On model you are considering.
Durability
Both brands utilize durable materials, but their focus areas differ. Saucony tends to prioritize outsole durability, incorporating high-abrasion rubber compounds to withstand wear and tear. This makes them a good choice for runners who put a lot of miles on their shoes. On focuses on the longevity of their CloudTec cushioning system, designed to retain its responsiveness and cushioning over extended use. The durability of the upper can vary between models in both brands, depending on the materials and construction used.
Overall Fit Recommendations
For runners who prefer a traditional, roomy fit with a wider toe box and consistent sizing, Saucony is generally a solid choice. Runners who prefer a snug, performance-oriented fit that promotes a more natural running form might prefer On. Ultimately, the best way to determine which brand is right for you is to try on different models and compare the fit and feel. Consider your foot shape, running style, and personal preferences when making your decision.
Finding Your Perfect Fit: Trying On Saucony and On Running Shoes
Trying On Saucony Shoes
Saucony offers a variety of fits, catering to different foot shapes and running styles. Their range spans from snug-fitting racing shoes to more accommodating models for everyday training. When trying on Sauconys, pay attention to the toe box. Some models, like the Kinvara, are known for a more pointed, performance-oriented fit, while others, like the Triumph, offer a wider toe box for more toe splay. Also, consider the feel of the midsole. Saucony utilizes various cushioning technologies, from the responsive PWRRUN+ to the plush PWRRUN PB. Walk around the store to get a feel for the cushioning and support level. Don’t be afraid to try on different models and sizes to find what works best for you. Consider bringing your own running socks to ensure a realistic fit. Saucony typically fits true to size, but it’s always wise to consult their size chart and customer reviews, especially if you’re ordering online. Pay attention to the heel cup; a secure fit is crucial for preventing blisters and slippage.
Trying On On Running Shoes
On Running shoes have a unique feel due to their CloudTec cushioning system. These “clouds” compress on impact and then expand, providing a distinct sensation. When trying on On shoes, you’ll immediately notice the flexible, almost sock-like upper of many models. This provides a comfortable, adaptive fit. Pay close attention to how the Cloud elements feel underfoot. Some runners find them incredibly comfortable, while others take some getting used to. Similar to trying on Sauconys, walk around the store to experience the cushioning and responsiveness. On shoes generally fit true to size, but trying them on is essential due to their distinctive construction. Consider the type of running you’ll be doing. On offers shoes for everything from road running to trail running, each with its own specific fit and features. Look at the heel counter; some models have a more minimalist design, while others offer more structured support.
Comparing Saucony and On Fits: A Detailed Look
Comparing the fit of Saucony and On running shoes can be tricky due to their differing technologies and design philosophies. Saucony tends to offer a more traditional running shoe fit, with various levels of cushioning and support within a more standard shoe structure. On, on the other hand, stands out with its CloudTec system, resulting in a unique feel and often a more flexible, adaptable fit. Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
Toe Box
Saucony generally offers a wider range of toe box shapes, from narrow to wide. On tends towards a more accommodating toe box, allowing for more natural toe splay. This can be a major plus for runners who prioritize comfort and freedom of movement in the forefoot.
Midsole
Saucony’s midsoles offer a variety of cushioning experiences, from firm and responsive to soft and plush. On’s CloudTec system provides a unique, almost bouncy feel. Some runners describe it as feeling like running on small pillows. This can be a game-changer for those seeking impact protection and a smooth ride.
Heel
Saucony usually features a more traditional heel counter, offering a secure and supportive fit. On’s heel counters can vary more depending on the model, with some being more minimalist and flexible, while others offer more structured support. Consider your personal preference and the level of stability you require.
Upper
Saucony’s uppers range from more traditional mesh constructions to engineered mesh and knit materials. On often uses highly flexible, engineered mesh and sometimes even sock-like constructions for a more adaptive and comfortable fit. This can be particularly appealing to runners who appreciate a snug, almost seamless feel.
Sizing
Both Saucony and On generally run true to size. However, due to the unique construction and feel of each brand, trying them on in person is highly recommended. This allows you to experience the fit and feel firsthand and ensures you select the right size for your foot.
Summary Table
| Feature | Saucony | On |
|---|---|---|
| Toe Box | Varies (narrow to wide) | Generally wider, accommodating |
| Midsole | Traditional cushioning (firm to plush) | CloudTec system (unique, bouncy feel) |
| Heel | Generally more structured support | Varies (minimalist to structured) |
| Upper | Mesh and engineered mesh | Flexible engineered mesh, sometimes sock-like |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
How Do Saucony’s Fit Compared to On?
Saucony and On Running shoes, while both designed for performance, cater to different foot shapes and running styles, resulting in distinct fit profiles. Saucony generally offers a more traditional fit, often described as “true to size” with varying widths available for a customized feel. They tend to provide a snug, secure fit throughout the midfoot and heel, with a spacious toe box that accommodates natural toe splay. This makes them a versatile choice for runners who appreciate a balanced feel and reliable support.
On Running shoes, on the other hand, are known for their unique CloudTec cushioning system which creates a distinctive, almost rocker-like sensation. The fit is often perceived as slightly narrower than Saucony, particularly in the forefoot. While they still allow for some toe splay, the emphasis is on a more streamlined, propulsive feel. This can be ideal for runners who prioritize a responsive ride and appreciate a snug, almost sock-like fit.
Ultimately, the best way to determine which brand fits you better is to try both on. Consider factors such as your foot shape, arch type, and running style. If you prefer a more traditional, accommodating fit with ample toe room, Saucony might be the better choice. If you prioritize a responsive, streamlined feel and a snug fit, On Running might be a better match.
People Also Ask About How Saucony’s Fit Compared to On
Do Saucony shoes run big or small?
Saucony shoes generally run true to size. However, some models may fit slightly differently, so it’s always a good idea to consult the brand’s size chart and customer reviews before purchasing. Their availability in varying widths also helps ensure a better fit.
Do On Running shoes run big or small?
On Running shoes tend to run true to size, although some runners find the fit to be slightly narrower than other brands, especially in the forefoot. Checking the brand’s size guide and reviews can help determine the best fit for your foot shape.
Are Saucony or On shoes better for wide feet?
Saucony typically offers a better fit for wide feet due to their availability in wider widths. While On Running shoes are not specifically designed for wide feet, certain models with a more accommodating toe box might provide a comfortable fit for some individuals with wider feet.
Which brand is best for long distances?
Both Saucony and On Running offer shoes suitable for long distances. The best choice depends on individual preferences. Saucony’s balanced cushioning and traditional fit can provide comfort and stability for longer runs. On’s CloudTec system provides a unique, responsive ride that some runners prefer for covering long distances, but the narrower fit may not be ideal for everyone.
Which is more stable, Saucony or On?
Saucony generally provides a more stable platform than On. Their shoes often feature more traditional support features, contributing to a secure and grounded feel. On Running shoes prioritize a lighter, more agile feel, which can result in a less stable feel for some runners, particularly those who require significant stability features.